Monday, June 27, 2011

selena gomez kissing justin bieber in

images selena gomez kissing justin selena gomez kissing justin bieber in. images justin bieber 2011
  • images justin bieber 2011


    • kewlchap
    04-06 01:15 AM
    Hello all,

    Anyone knows if there is a certain length of time that I need to be employed with my GC sponsor after 485 approval?

    I have heard 3-4 months, but I am wondering if there is legal time limit or if this is a "good faith" limit.

    Appreciate responses.



    wallpaper images justin bieber 2011 selena gomez kissing justin bieber in. selena gomez and justin bieber
  • selena gomez and justin bieber


    • Asian
    11-21 09:38 AM
    I am all for it. I know some members are bitter about this potential price hike but they can still choose not to, if they don't want to.

    Actually, time is money. We should not underestimate the time value of our waiting in terms of dollars. It would be still beneficial to get the GC sooner despite higher cost and find the better paid jobs without strings attached. Still many good companies are unwilling to hire h-1 b for various reasons. The time value I have lost in years of waiting is a lot more costly.

    As you all remember in economics, when the demand and supply doesn't meet and regulated with fixed price, there is a long line of waiting.

    As the legal process is stuck, many people are considering marriage with citizens, which is not an option for me. If not well thought of before making a decision, many will eventually divorce and the cost will be even more costly for the individuals and to the society.

    Sorry if that title is misleading.

    How many people here are positive that USCIS will come up with premium processing feature for I-485 stage?

    Don' worry about the available visa numbers. Just express your hunch feeling.

    Incrementally the waiting game is being reduced by incorporating premium processing for H1-B, Labor and lately I-140. Why not for I-485?

    I am hopefull of this happening next year.
    What about you?



    selena gomez kissing justin bieber in. selena gomez and justin bieber
  • selena gomez and justin bieber


    • cagedcactus
    10-31 10:58 AM
    For those who are new to the forums, please contact Walking_dude to sign up for an active membership in Michigan chapter. We all need to join hands and go to work. We have core members standing behind us, ready to back us up on various issues regarding backlogs and other immigration issues.
    Help us help yourselves.....
    Rise now, its now or never....



    2011 selena gomez and justin bieber selena gomez kissing justin bieber in. Selena Gomez and Justin Bieber
  • Selena Gomez and Justin Bieber


    • CHHAYA
    04-20 01:19 PM
    I filed on March 10 2011 at texas service center, check was cashed on 3/15. Hope that helps.

    Thanks.


    more...

    selena gomez kissing justin bieber in. justin bieber and selena gomez
  • justin bieber and selena gomez


    • bluekayal
    08-21 11:37 AM
    Because they are sitting and looking at the Service Requests generated by the National Customer Service. There were 9000 of them a couple of days ago.



    selena gomez kissing justin bieber in. justin bieber and selena gomez
  • justin bieber and selena gomez


    • invincibleasian
    03-27 02:03 PM
    I received my Labor Certificate with PERM process. Right now, I can't continue the process for I-140 and I-485. My lawyer just found out that my degree is Master of Business Administration, while the Labor Certificate is based on Master of Science. My current position is Software Engineer.

    My questions are:
    1. Is there a problem of having an MBA and working as a software engineer? As my understanding, MBA and MSc are the same level.
    2. Can I continue the case since I already got my Labor Certificate?

    I appreciate your feedback. Thank you.
    Amend the LC!


    more...

    selena gomez kissing justin bieber in. Justin Bieber and Selena Gomez
  • Justin Bieber and Selena Gomez


    • alkg
    10-24 10:19 AM
    July 2nd Filer.
    Reciept notice received on October 11th on Phone.
    Waiting for EAD,AP.
    FP Not Done

    Still waiting for physical receipts ,EAD and AP.............
    :mad::(:confused:



    2010 selena gomez and justin bieber selena gomez kissing justin bieber in. selena gomez kissing justin
  • selena gomez kissing justin


    • pappu
    01-07 07:18 PM
    http://immigrationvoice.org/

    Please stay tuned for a massive IV campaign coming up. We will be announcing it tonight on the forums.
    Contact your chapter leaders for various state chapter action items.


    more...

    selena gomez kissing justin bieber in. Justin Bieber amp; Selena Gomez
  • Justin Bieber amp; Selena Gomez


    • vpa_2009
    03-20 06:50 AM
    I sold the house on H1 and there was nothing addition for H1 holder. It is just that if you have that property for less than 2 years then you pay tax.

    Just thinking if the new law for GC approved like buy a house and get
    GC then what will happen for those like us who have house since 2004 and sold one and bought another in that time period.
    I am on EAD now. PD -Nov 2003



    hair Selena Gomez and Justin Bieber selena gomez kissing justin bieber in. Justin Bieber and Selena Gomez
  • Justin Bieber and Selena Gomez


    • leoindiano
    03-17 11:54 AM
    there was randon LUD's over weekends....It could be accidental that LUD happened in same week. Your lawyer should be able to do an enquiry into it...


    more...

    selena gomez kissing justin bieber in. girlfriend Justin Bieber and Selena justin bieber kisses selena gomez on.
  • girlfriend Justin Bieber and Selena justin bieber kisses selena gomez on.


    • leoindiano
    09-15 11:53 AM
    Great Idea...

    I have all the pictures, I have my degree, technical certifications. We can also put the pictures of our homes if we have one.



    hot justin bieber and selena gomez selena gomez kissing justin bieber in. selena gomez kissing justin
  • selena gomez kissing justin


    • heathere3
    04-17 03:13 PM
    It's alright abt the red dot. Is there a way I can find out who gave it to me? Just curious!

    Thanks guyz for helping out!

    Doesn't matter now, I fixed it! :D
    I thought your post was completely logical and I'm interested in knowing if there's a way to draw the USCIS's attention to these bad employers!


    more...

    house Justin Bieber And Selena Gomez selena gomez kissing justin bieber in. justin bieber and selena gomez
  • justin bieber and selena gomez


    • eager_immi
    07-11 12:32 PM
    True but these were not applications that were filed 2 weeks back. Many people had 485 pending for over 2 years due to retrogression. Also a lot of cases that got a visa # still had pending security checks so technically they did not approve 60K 485, they only used up the visa#s.Why not? USCIS already approved 60K 485 applications in 2 weeks time. How come they cannot do the same with some extra money (i.e. premium processing). They can do anything if want to do.



    tattoo justin bieber and selena gomez selena gomez kissing justin bieber in. Justin Bieber amp; Selena Gomez Kissing at Billboard Music Awards
  • Justin Bieber amp; Selena Gomez Kissing at Billboard Music Awards


    • sunny26
    04-26 09:48 PM
    I traveled recently from DTW to india using lufthansa. Allowed two baggage for me and 2 for my son(4yrs old) without any problem


    more...

    pictures Justin Bieber and Selena Gomez selena gomez kissing justin bieber in. May 28, 2011. justin bieber
  • May 28, 2011. justin bieber


    • reddy77
    04-12 02:20 PM
    Gurus, I just got an email about RFE on 485 application for both of us (myself and wife). My PD is Sep 2006, EB2, not sure why the application got opened and whats the RFE about. I am still working on h1 (renewed based on approved 140) and still has 1.5 years left. Is someone on the same boat, i mean RFE's on 485 though PD is not current??? If the RFE is about my employment, would my wife also get the RFE ?? I am with the same employer from almost 6 years.Do i get the copy of RFE too or just the attorney?? Thanks Guys, appreciate your help ....



    dresses selena gomez kissing justin selena gomez kissing justin bieber in. gt;Justin Bieber chooses a
  • gt;Justin Bieber chooses a


    • chanduv23
    03-25 02:24 PM
    I went to Chennai and Hyderabad thru Dubai in last 2 years. I felt it was really nice. No transit visa stuff. Good veggie food, lot of entertainment and good service. A bit costly compared to other airlines. On overall good experience and no regrets for higher price

    My experiences have been the best with Emirates and have always travelled Emirates. But the last time I travelled, I had a bad experience.
    I travelled from JFK to Chennai in August, 2007 and my baggage did not come in the same flight. They had to trace the baggage and then both my bags arrived in 2 different days and I had to buy clothes, shoes, nightwear but Emirates reimbursed and gave me like $60 in cash for all expenses.
    Apart from this, I have had pleasant experiences with Emirates and will continue to fly emirates.


    more...

    makeup Justin Bieber amp; Selena Gomez selena gomez kissing justin bieber in. Justin Bieber And Selena Gomez
  • Justin Bieber And Selena Gomez


    • casinoroyale
    01-07 09:11 AM
    I have done paid consultation with murthy office on this matter. As per them, one can continue to work on H1B even after returning on AP. One can also do H1B transfer to a different employer. Ofcourse, your exiting 797 should be valid while you are doing this. One can find this surprising, even after you "use EAD" you can ask for reinstatement of H1B status by filing H1 extension but one has to leave the country and apply for H1B stamp and enter on H1 to reinstate H1B status in this case.



    girlfriend Justin Bieber amp; Selena Gomez Kissing at Billboard Music Awards selena gomez kissing justin bieber in. selena gomez and justin bieber kissing on the lips. Justin+ieber+kissing+
  • selena gomez and justin bieber kissing on the lips. Justin+ieber+kissing+


    • paskal
    10-26 12:25 AM
    Hi,

    I suggest you guys bump this thread periodically and keep it on the front page.
    Lynne, I can provide you some help with info on IV members in IN.
    Please pm/e mail me. Thanks for your effort!



    hairstyles girlfriend Justin Bieber and Selena justin bieber kisses selena gomez on. selena gomez kissing justin bieber in. selena gomez kissing justin
  • selena gomez kissing justin


    • hnordberg
    June 12th, 2004, 12:35 PM
    ]']I only own a Tamron 28-200 XR at the moment :), mounted in my 300D :) . But maybe is possible to create big bubbles using bath gel... I should try :D .
    You can get extension tubes and/or a front lens attachment for close-up work with your 28-200. Close-up is so much fun, so get some cheap stuff (e.g., Kenko extension tubes) and start shooting! Don't worry about the quality of the equipment when starting out. You take great pictures with simple and cheap equipment. And consider flashing your 300D with the Russian hack to get mirror lockup. I haven't done it yet, but I am thinking about it. Hmm, might make for an interesting poll in the 300D forum....
    Level I/II/III/IV wages and EB2 [Archive] - Immigration Voice
    Log in

    View Full Version : Level I/II/III/IV wages and EB2




    vedicman
    01-04 08:34 AM
    Ten years ago, George W. Bush came to Washington as the first new president in a generation or more who had deep personal convictions about immigration policy and some plans for where he wanted to go with it. He wasn't alone. Lots of people in lots of places were ready to work on the issue: Republicans, Democrats, Hispanic advocates, business leaders, even the Mexican government.

    Like so much else about the past decade, things didn't go well. Immigration policy got kicked around a fair bit, but next to nothing got accomplished. Old laws and bureaucracies became increasingly dysfunctional. The public grew anxious. The debates turned repetitive, divisive and sterile.

    The last gasp of the lost decade came this month when the lame-duck Congress - which struck compromises on taxes, gays in the military andarms control - deadlocked on the Dream Act.

    The debate was pure political theater. The legislation was first introduced in 2001 to legalize the most virtuous sliver of the undocumented population - young adults who were brought here as children by their parents and who were now in college or the military. It was originally designed to be the first in a sequence of measures to resolve the status of the nation's illegal immigrants, and for most of the past decade, it was often paired with a bill for agricultural workers. The logic was to start with the most worthy and economically necessary. But with the bill put forward this month as a last-minute, stand-alone measure with little chance of passage, all the debate accomplished was to give both sides a chance to excite their followers. In the age of stalemate, immigration may have a special place in the firmament.

    The United States is in the midst of a wave of immigration as substantial as any ever experienced. Millions of people from abroad have settled here peacefully and prosperously, a boon to the nation. Nonetheless, frustration with policy sours the mood. More than a quarter of the foreign-born are here without authorization. Meanwhile, getting here legally can be a long, costly wrangle. And communities feel that they have little say over sudden changes in their populations. People know that their world is being transformed, yet Washington has not enacted a major overhaul of immigration law since 1965. To move forward, we need at least three fundamental changes in the way the issue is handled.

    Being honest about our circumstances is always a good place to start. There might once have been a time to ponder the ideal immigration system for the early 21st century, but surely that time has passed. The immediate task is to clean up the mess caused by inaction, and that is going to require compromises on all sides. Next, we should reexamine the scope of policy proposals. After a decade of sweeping plans that went nowhere, working piecemeal is worth a try at this point. Finally, the politics have to change. With both Republicans and Democrats using immigration as a wedge issue, the chances are that innocent bystanders will get hurt - soon.

    The most intractable problem by far involves the 11 million or so undocumented immigrants currently living in the United States. They are the human legacy of unintended consequences and the failure to act.

    Advocates on one side, mostly Republicans, would like to see enforcement policies tough enough to induce an exodus. But that does not seem achievable anytime soon, because unauthorized immigrants have proved to be a very durable and resilient population. The number of illegal arrivals dropped sharply during the recession, but the people already here did not leave, though they faced massive unemployment and ramped-up deportations. If they could ride out those twin storms, how much enforcement over how many years would it take to seriously reduce their numbers? Probably too much and too many to be feasible. Besides, even if Democrats suffer another electoral disaster or two, they are likely still to have enough votes in the Senate to block an Arizona-style law that would make every cop an alien-hunter.

    Advocates on the other side, mostly Democrats, would like to give a path to citizenship to as many of the undocumented as possible. That also seems unlikely; Republicans have blocked every effort at legalization. Beyond all the principled arguments, the Republicans would have to be politically suicidal to offer citizenship, and therefore voting rights, to 11 million people who would be likely to vote against them en masse.

    So what happens to these folks? As a starting point, someone could ask them what they want. The answer is likely to be fairly limited: the chance to live and work in peace, the ability to visit their countries of origin without having to sneak back across the border and not much more.

    Would they settle for a legal life here without citizenship? Well, it would be a huge improvement over being here illegally. Aside from peace of mind, an incalculable benefit, it would offer the near-certainty of better jobs. That is a privilege people will pay for, and they could be asked to keep paying for it every year they worked. If they coughed up one, two, three thousand dollars annually on top of all other taxes, would that be enough to dent the argument that undocumented residents drain public treasuries?

    There would be a larger cost, however, if legalization came without citizenship: the cost to the nation's political soul of having a population deliberately excluded from the democratic process. No one would set out to create such a population. But policy failures have created something worse. We have 11 million people living among us who not only can't vote but also increasingly are afraid to report a crime or to get vaccinations for a child or to look their landlord in the eye.

    �

    Much of the debate over the past decade has been about whether legalization would be an unjust reward for "lawbreakers." The status quo, however, rewards everyone who has ever benefited from the cheap, disposable labor provided by illegal workers. To start to fix the situation, everyone - undocumented workers, employers, consumers, lawmakers - has to admit their errors and make amends.

    The lost decade produced big, bold plans for social engineering. It was a 10-year quest for a grand bargain that would repair the entire system at once, through enforcement, ID cards, legalization, a temporary worker program and more. Fierce cloakroom battles were also fought over the shape and size of legal immigration. Visa categories became a venue for ideological competition between business, led by the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, and elements of labor, led by the AFL-CIO, over regulation of the labor market: whether to keep it tight to boost wages or keep it loose to boost growth.

    But every attempt to fix everything at once produced a political parabola effect. As legislation reached higher, its base of support narrowed. The last effort, and the biggest of them all, collapsed on the Senate floor in July 2007. Still, the idea of a grand bargain has been kept on life support by advocates of generous policies. Just last week, President Obama and Hispanic lawmakers renewed their vows to seek comprehensive immigration reform, even as the prospects grow bleaker. Meanwhile, the other side has its own designs, demanding total control over the border and an enforcement system with no leaks before anything else can happen.

    Perhaps 10 years ago, someone like George W. Bush might reasonably have imagined that immigration policy was a good place to resolve some very basic social and economic issues. Since then, however, the rhetoric around the issue has become so swollen and angry that it inflames everything it touches. Keeping the battles small might increase the chance that each side will win some. But, as we learned with the Dream Act, even taking small steps at this point will require rebooting the discourse.

    Not long ago, certainly a decade ago, immigration was often described as an issue of strange bedfellows because it did not divide people neatly along partisan or ideological lines. That world is gone now. Instead, elements of both parties are using immigration as a wedge issue. The intended result is cleaving, not consensus. This year, many Republicans campaigned on vows, sometimes harshly stated, to crack down on illegal immigration. Meanwhile, many Democrats tried to rally Hispanic voters by demonizing restrictionists on the other side.

    Immigration politics could thus become a way for both sides to feed polarization. In the short term, they can achieve their political objectives by stoking voters' anxiety with the scariest hobgoblins: illegal immigrants vs. the racists who would lock them up. Stumbling down this road would produce a decade more lost than the last.

    Suro in Wasahington Post

    Roberto Suro is a professor of journalism and public policy at the University of Southern California. surorob@gmail.com



    leoindiano
    03-17 11:54 AM
    there was randon LUD's over weekends....It could be accidental that LUD happened in same week. Your lawyer should be able to do an enquiry into it...


    Posted by Agraj at 3:40 AM

    No comments:

    Post a Comment

    Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)